regardless of the parent's ability to pay?
Is it cheaper to provide physician's services on the taxpayer dime for regular check ups for children?
Or have taxpayers pay when the child visits the emergency room because their parents couldn't afford a routine check up?
Seems like a no-brainer to me, but.....What is the point of being "pro-life" if you don't support manditory health care for all children?Pro life isn't about kids, it's about controlling female sexual behaviourWhat is the point of being "pro-life" if you don't support manditory health care for all children?
It's the weird, convulted rhetoric of personal responsibilty.What is the point of being "pro-life" if you don't support manditory health care for all children?Seeing as almost all poor children are indeed eligible for state health care programs then the question is moot. I think most people support children having access to health-care. Unfortunately the government sometimes has to step in and help children when parents won't..
Pro-life is all about children and nothing about controlling sexual behavior..
I am pro-life and pro-univeral care...
your point????What is the point of being "pro-life" if you don't support manditory health care for all children?control of the woman is the point of the pro-life movement.
They see it as a way to keep women as objects.What is the point of being "pro-life" if you don't support manditory health care for all children?
not all people believe in western medicine. there is still freedom of religion in this country..I am not religious but i have a huge problem with big pharma. i take it upon myself to take care of my own body. why take mandatory vitamins daily loaded in a artificial sugar coating, when all the vitamins you need are in organic fresh fruits and vegetables?
besides, anything with the word "mandatory" is not a sign of a free society. will there be mandatory vaccines as well?
mandatory diet changes? mandatory birth control? mandatory 2 child rule? where does the word mandatory end in the name of health? I do not trust my government to take care of my body..they cannot even take care of the budget let alone the other federally ran programs that have already plumited..
"regardless of the parent's ability to pay?"
I'm certain that 99% or more of those who oppose the brutal and bloodthirsty tyrants who murder small babies also support a baby's right to health care. That does NOT, however, obligate us to pay for health care for the children of multi-millionaires.What is the point of being "pro-life" if you don't support manditory health care for all children?
I don't believe in mandatory health care for anyone. It should always be a choice decided by the individual or his/her guardian. Not the state. But I will agree that it should be available for all children.
Checkups are fine. Mandatory medicating is not. Just to clarify. And I don't believe that health care should be provided free of charge to people that can afford to pay.
self sufficiency. God helps those who help themselves.
do you libs believe that everyone should depend on the state for everything? no wonder that as individuals you are so much weaker than conservatives.
p.s. no hospital will turn anyone away regardless of their insurance situation. you go to the emergency room and you will get the best quality health care, and you know the tax payers will end up paying anyways. you people just need an excuse to spend another 10 trillion dollars.
All for mandatory health care for Children as long as it's the parent and not the Taxpayer who is forced to provided it.
That is a no brainer. If you can feed em (or care for em) don't breed em.
i think everybody should have health care as long as it is the right type and the right medications.that means the medicine that has no side effects like the secret societies receive.not what we get.
There are Government run clinics in every state, what child are you speaking of? Even the illegals get health care.
If everything fit into nice little boxes like that, things would be great. How about this:
The parents of said children put off the big screen flat panel TV and buy health insurance... You can buy 10 months of health insurance for less than the average cost of a large TV. I have seen it MANY times... If you think that the idea of universal health care is either good or cheap, ask anyone in canada or england who has had to have a specialty surgery (such as open heart, or neuro).
There is a reason that there are more Neurosurgeons in LA county than their are in Canada.
Why do people think that the government has the magical power to do ANYthing better, much less everything?
Example from education: It takes an average of $35k to put a child through public school. It takes an average of $16k to put a child through peroquial school. Need I mention that Peroquial taught children are more than three times as likely to go to college and more than twice as likely to finish college.
Now given this example, why do you think that the government running health care will be any better?
Because the government should not be responsible for everything, including providing healthcare to every child. Just like government should not be funding abortions overseas.
Every child can get healthcare now. There are free clinics everywhere, and the ER's must accept everyone regardless of how much they are able to pay.
Government healthcare will make the current healthcare system worse. Just watch any TV documentary on Universal Healthcare in Canada or the UK.
The bottom line is that the government has no right to forcefully take an individuals money to pay for something they deem necessary. Its a matter of principle. If they allowed us to keep all of our money (end income tax, end welfare, end outrageous foreign policy, end foreign aid) the people would have more money to spend and they would spend it on charities of their choice. Let the people decide who their money helps. The kids would be taken care of out of the good will of the people.
Dont get mad at the people who are against universal healthcare get mad at the governmet that spends over a trillion dollars a year overseas and neglect the children it could be going to!
Im pro life, I support mandatory health care for CHILDREN regardless of their parents ability to pay. Im fine with my tax dollars helping to keep kids healthy.
Have you not heard of the S-Chip program. it is medical care for every child in America.
Your point is moot considering that we do have medical care for ALL of our children.
Look it up!
The thing is on this is what type of government appointed doctors would they get? ? ? You see, that is why I would be against government provided health care! Why add on to the woes of the middle class with more taxes?!
If you are mature to bring kids into the world, then you should be able to provide for that kid, and not the tax payer! The middle class makes up for the bulk of the tax payer in this country of ours.
Mandatory Health Care would be another excuse for the fleecing of the middle class.
EDIT: Being pro life is NOT keeping a woman down! NO! It is about protecting the sanctity of an unborn human being!
Pro-Life : Parent responsibility to have the child ... Health Care for Children : Parent responsibility to care for the child ... Note that it is not a sin for the parents to sacrifice for the welfare of their children ! Do you think that the cost of a cell phone monthly bill ( say 50 bucks a month ; $600.00 a year ) could be sacrificed and applied to a health plan for their child as "Parent responsibility" ? Same for a cable bill , Air Jordan shoes , big screen TVs , DRUGS , %26amp; ( "cigarettes" @ $4.00 per pack , 1 a pack a day , 352 packs a year = 352 packs x $4.00 per pack = $ 1,408.00 a year , that should buy a nice child health care plan without the government taking any of my money to pay for some irresponsible Parent that puts "things" before planning for emergencies for their children ? How frigging much Parent responsibility do you want to forfeit for habits and unnecessary non life sustaining items to go toward "No parent responsibility" !!!!!!!!!!
Heaven needs Children -- not fetuses!!!!!!
the point of being pro-life is not letting women murder baby because they couldn't keep their legs closed, take care of your responsibility if you can lay on your back and have sex, then you must be able to have a baby, and you don't even have to keep it, but give it up for adoption to people who would love the baby ABORTION IS MURDER
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aborti鈥?/a>
look at this map...it basically explains why abortion should remain legal.
Sunday, February 26, 2012
Help with carpets on low income with child with asthma ?
My son has asthma and doctors gave told me that if I change the carpets in my house it could reduce his symptoms but as I'm on a low income I can't afford these but someone said there is something you can get to help with things like this if your child gas health problems does anyone know ??? ThanksHelp with carpets on low income with child with asthma ?my son has asthma and all you do is vacuum regularly, wet dust furniture and ornaments
get rid of rugs and cushions that harbour dust and don't use artificial air fresheners
I couldn't afford to get rid of carpets all at the one time, but gradually I've been replacing carpets
with laminate flooring, starting off with his bedroomHelp with carpets on low income with child with asthma ?Hi - best way to cut down dust in the house is to gradually change to laminate or tiled flooring. Keep curtains to a minimum - use blackout blinds instead. No rugs, cushions, throws etc. Anywhere that the house-dust mite can live.
Don't abandon everything but prioritise the areas which you son is in eg. if he's not in your bedroom or other bedrooms in the house much then leave them to last.
As for benefits if you're on a low income you may already be getting income support or income based tax credits. If you are then go to your local Benefits Office if you can and ask, at worst they can only say no. Try Citizens Advice bureau for information if you can't get to a Benefits Office, or try some of the big Asthma charities, who knows, they might be able to helpHelp with carpets on low income with child with asthma ?i dont know anything about the income/benefits side of things.
but removing the carpets will definately help. anything like wooden flooring/lyno/tiles will make a difference especially in his bedroom.
also think about the bed and dust mites. hoovering and turning the mattress regualarly and changing the sheets regualrly will help.
and just in case, dont have any pets in the house be it dogs/cats/rodents/birds. all will add to the problem.
speaking from experience here, i am 38 and have had asthma since birth.
hope this helps.
get rid of rugs and cushions that harbour dust and don't use artificial air fresheners
I couldn't afford to get rid of carpets all at the one time, but gradually I've been replacing carpets
with laminate flooring, starting off with his bedroomHelp with carpets on low income with child with asthma ?Hi - best way to cut down dust in the house is to gradually change to laminate or tiled flooring. Keep curtains to a minimum - use blackout blinds instead. No rugs, cushions, throws etc. Anywhere that the house-dust mite can live.
Don't abandon everything but prioritise the areas which you son is in eg. if he's not in your bedroom or other bedrooms in the house much then leave them to last.
As for benefits if you're on a low income you may already be getting income support or income based tax credits. If you are then go to your local Benefits Office if you can and ask, at worst they can only say no. Try Citizens Advice bureau for information if you can't get to a Benefits Office, or try some of the big Asthma charities, who knows, they might be able to helpHelp with carpets on low income with child with asthma ?i dont know anything about the income/benefits side of things.
but removing the carpets will definately help. anything like wooden flooring/lyno/tiles will make a difference especially in his bedroom.
also think about the bed and dust mites. hoovering and turning the mattress regualarly and changing the sheets regualrly will help.
and just in case, dont have any pets in the house be it dogs/cats/rodents/birds. all will add to the problem.
speaking from experience here, i am 38 and have had asthma since birth.
hope this helps.
Which cooking oil is good for health particularly children below 5 years?
I heard that we have to change the cooking oil frequently. Which cooking oil is good for health particularly children below 5 years?Sunflower oil is good and do not reuse it Which cooking oil is good for health particularly children below 5 years?
A good oil should contain higher amount of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats and with minimal or no saturated fats and trans fats. All of the following oils are low in saturated fats and trans fats , some have high concentration of saffloweroil, sunflower oil, soy oil or cacola oil if you wish to fly foods these oils have higher smoke point.
The following are goods oils:
1- Cacola Oil
2- Flax Seed Oil
3-Peanut Oil
4-Olive OIl
5-Sunflower Oil
6- Corn OilWhich cooking oil is good for health particularly children below 5 years?Safola is good 4 cholestrol control n obiviously its for people above say 20..
for below 5 mugfali oil is better whtever brand u try..
it is so because it has more fats and children at this age needs more enegy as they are very playful..Which cooking oil is good for health particularly children below 5 years?
Sunflower Oil, Corn Oil, Olive OilWhich cooking oil is good for health particularly children below 5 years?Canola and Olive OilWhich cooking oil is good for health particularly children below 5 years?
I think SAfola................translator french to english
A good oil should contain higher amount of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats and with minimal or no saturated fats and trans fats. All of the following oils are low in saturated fats and trans fats , some have high concentration of saffloweroil, sunflower oil, soy oil or cacola oil if you wish to fly foods these oils have higher smoke point.
The following are goods oils:
1- Cacola Oil
2- Flax Seed Oil
3-Peanut Oil
4-Olive OIl
5-Sunflower Oil
6- Corn OilWhich cooking oil is good for health particularly children below 5 years?Safola is good 4 cholestrol control n obiviously its for people above say 20..
for below 5 mugfali oil is better whtever brand u try..
it is so because it has more fats and children at this age needs more enegy as they are very playful..Which cooking oil is good for health particularly children below 5 years?
Sunflower Oil, Corn Oil, Olive OilWhich cooking oil is good for health particularly children below 5 years?Canola and Olive OilWhich cooking oil is good for health particularly children below 5 years?
I think SAfola................
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Why don't we just tally up the total cost of health care and split it up between every man woman and child?
No need for actuaries, deniers of claims or outrageous CEO salariesWhy don't we just tally up the total cost of health care and split it up between every man woman and child?Doesn't work that simple. Tally it up? who sets the price? Are you going to use it responsibly since you don't have to pay for your own care? What gets covered? Who is making the decisions? Is it the doctor or a board that sets forth protocol?Why don't we just tally up the total cost of health care and split it up between every man woman and child?
Because Communism suxWhy don't we just tally up the total cost of health care and split it up between every man woman and child?There is no money.
If there was, we wouldn't be having the debate.
First, because every man, woman and child cannot or does not pay taxes. Second, it shouldn't be a MANDATE to do so. We are not communists. People should be a little alarmed at the least that we skipped the socialism altogether and went to communism. How's that change now working for ya?Why don't we just tally up the total cost of health care and split it up between every man woman and child?That's what we are going to do, only we are going to pay insurance companies to dole the money back out to us.Why don't we just tally up the total cost of health care and split it up between every man woman and child?
Because - when all is said and done, this so-called health care reform will cost more than anyone can calculate; and not just in dollar$.
Because 50% of America can't stand helping their fellow man with their hard-earned dollars nor see that in some form or fashion that those hard-earned dollars were derived from their fellow man.Why don't we just tally up the total cost of health care and split it up between every man woman and child?
It still wouldn't be enough.
Because Communism suxWhy don't we just tally up the total cost of health care and split it up between every man woman and child?There is no money.
If there was, we wouldn't be having the debate.
First, because every man, woman and child cannot or does not pay taxes. Second, it shouldn't be a MANDATE to do so. We are not communists. People should be a little alarmed at the least that we skipped the socialism altogether and went to communism. How's that change now working for ya?Why don't we just tally up the total cost of health care and split it up between every man woman and child?That's what we are going to do, only we are going to pay insurance companies to dole the money back out to us.Why don't we just tally up the total cost of health care and split it up between every man woman and child?
Because - when all is said and done, this so-called health care reform will cost more than anyone can calculate; and not just in dollar$.
Because 50% of America can't stand helping their fellow man with their hard-earned dollars nor see that in some form or fashion that those hard-earned dollars were derived from their fellow man.Why don't we just tally up the total cost of health care and split it up between every man woman and child?
It still wouldn't be enough.
What were the health and illness of children's in the past like?
There are many new diseases we haven't heard of in the past occurring now.
-How both health and illness of children were in the past?
- what types of diseases were in the past? are they still present (ratings)?What were the health and illness of children's in the past like?there were lots as people did not have the money to provide good food and vitamins heating houses damp lots of chest and lung problems,TB was a big killer and Rickets,evan children died of the flu,people did not know anything and there children suffered or the did not have the money for a doctor http://www.patient.co.uk/showdoc/2700132鈥?/a> hope this has helped youWhat were the health and illness of children's in the past like?It was fairly common for children to die of infectious diseases before their fifth birthday. ( pneumonia, flu.)
There was less awareness of accident prevention, so there were more children who died from accidents.
And, of course, preemies being saved was virtually unknown.
-How both health and illness of children were in the past?
- what types of diseases were in the past? are they still present (ratings)?What were the health and illness of children's in the past like?there were lots as people did not have the money to provide good food and vitamins heating houses damp lots of chest and lung problems,TB was a big killer and Rickets,evan children died of the flu,people did not know anything and there children suffered or the did not have the money for a doctor http://www.patient.co.uk/showdoc/2700132鈥?/a> hope this has helped youWhat were the health and illness of children's in the past like?It was fairly common for children to die of infectious diseases before their fifth birthday. ( pneumonia, flu.)
There was less awareness of accident prevention, so there were more children who died from accidents.
And, of course, preemies being saved was virtually unknown.
Report Abuse
IL Divorce - Who is responsible for paying the child healthcare deductible?
My wife's ex choose to screw over his child by choosing an extremely high 5000 dollar deductible to pay next to nothing, but at the same time fulfilling his requirement to provide health insurance for the child. The divorce decree does not state anything other than "The father is responsible for healthcare insurance until 18." Is the policy holder responsible for any copays or deductibles or is the person who brings her in responsible? This is for the state of Illinois. Also, if the policy holder (father) is responsible is it acceptable to put the father as the "bill to" person?IL Divorce - Who is responsible for paying the child healthcare deductible?Legally, the bills would be 50/50. Most courts will not get into nitpicking about such "small" bills. So the couple is left to fight it out. No you can't assign the bill to anyone other than the person bringing the child in for care.IL Divorce - Who is responsible for paying the child healthcare deductible?
Where I'm from it's split 50/50IL Divorce - Who is responsible for paying the child healthcare deductible?the policy holder is the one responsible for co-payment. there are even options that he can take that would allow him to pay a certain amount of the deductible monthly. and yes it is acceptable to bill the father. after all he is the father and should not have a problem with that.IL Divorce - Who is responsible for paying the child healthcare deductible?
The deductible and any applicable bills/copays are usually split between both parents. What does the divorce decree say? IL Divorce - Who is responsible for paying the child healthcare deductible?It is split 50/50 unless you got it in the divorce decree. You can talk to him and get it changed or take him back to court. Should only cost you 1-2k if you get a lawyer. Thats better than $2500 a year in co pay. He needs to realize he is responsible for half also. But if he chooses not to pay, you only option is to take him to court.
Where I'm from it's split 50/50IL Divorce - Who is responsible for paying the child healthcare deductible?the policy holder is the one responsible for co-payment. there are even options that he can take that would allow him to pay a certain amount of the deductible monthly. and yes it is acceptable to bill the father. after all he is the father and should not have a problem with that.IL Divorce - Who is responsible for paying the child healthcare deductible?
The deductible and any applicable bills/copays are usually split between both parents. What does the divorce decree say? IL Divorce - Who is responsible for paying the child healthcare deductible?It is split 50/50 unless you got it in the divorce decree. You can talk to him and get it changed or take him back to court. Should only cost you 1-2k if you get a lawyer. Thats better than $2500 a year in co pay. He needs to realize he is responsible for half also. But if he chooses not to pay, you only option is to take him to court.
Health care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?
Is this a good thing, or a bad thing?
I'm just wondering. Seems since America is such a wonderful land, and the leader of the free world, this should be attainable.
If you have insurance, it's ok. My daughter just broke her arm, and it has been a fairly painless process for us (well, not her...she is broken!)
What about the uninsured folks?
What's your take on this American issue?Health care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?1st sorry to hear about your daughter.
I live in Australia. And as an Australian you have the right to free medical care. Medicare is available to all Australians, whether you are born here or become a citizen.
No matter how rich or poor you are.
You take your medicare card to the doctor or hospital with you and then the doctor or hospital bills Medicare later for your consultation.
Now, with the way the US economy is compared to the AU economy, then why can't the US Government get it together?Health care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?
I live in the UK and all our health care is freeHealth care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?Exactly how does that work?
Are we going to require the doctors to work for free, or are we going to take tax money from those that have insurance for their families to pay the doctors to treat people without insurance?
I think it's a great idea, but I'm just wondering who we are going to steal from to do this.
46 million Americans have no basic health insurance. Half of that number are Women and Children, no other major country
on Earth treats Women and Children this badly. I would like to see them covered but I prefer allowing them to buy into Medicare for themselves and the kids up to age 18. This would help new moms with pre natal care and Kids with regular Doctor visits and early treatment. As it is now, tax payers pay anyway because all the un insured go without regular visits til the illness gets really bad then they are a charity case. That increases cost for those that can pay for Health care and don't have Insurance.Health care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?lCost ! The price for decent, universal health care is prohibitive. Besides, I am not my brothers keeper. There are way too many dead beats looking for others to resolve their problems, and the fact is, nobody is denied health care, in an emergency.
I suppose it is your thought to offer this amenity to illegal immigrants, as well.
If you really want to know more about it, study the Canadian health care plan. Those in Canada who can afford it, drop down to the lower 48 for their health care. In Canada, the quality of care, and the long, long waits, make it extremely undesirable.Health care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?
That would be a great thing!
Now you have to persuade all the inconsiderate people in America that have no compassion for children in need, to vote for it. Good luck. There's a lot of greedy people who think it should be "survival of the fittest" and "only the strong survive" and stuff like that. Mean huh?
We should be like Canada ALL health care paid for. For ALLHealth care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?
maybe its just AZ but here we have AHCCCS (Arizona health care cost containment system) I was raised by a WORKING single mother and was raised on ahcccs health care. docs have said its best insurance available. its availabe to all low income families and individuals. Problem for liberals is that its a state thing and liberals hate states rights and individualism, they want the UNITED STATE of america. give up on the fed gove. and go bother youre individual state to take action.
NO, not if you TRULY belive in fairness. The American way is that everyone gets the same chance at a good life and that by getting what you earned you end up better off than those who didn't do enough to earn a good life. Socialized anything is terribely unfair to anyone who works hard. Besides your not very well informed, we Americans give more money, food, free health care, and other aid to the less fortunate than any other 2 or 3 countries combined.
We sent hundreds of millions and thousands of people for aid to indoneisa after the tsuanami, the Britts sent cots in boxes. Socialists don't really care about the poor, they just say they do to gain power.
lol @ "yummy mummy"- I feel sorry for you sweet heart! You have no idea what GOOD health care is I have heard from many americans who have had Britt health care while visiting, and they are all horrified by how bad it is. China is even worse, worlds tallest woman is dieing because she can't get a surgery she needs to turn off her growth gland.
I think free health care should be a given in any developed country.
I also think it is cruel and inhumain to let people suffer proper health care just because they aren't as well off as others.
I'm just wondering. Seems since America is such a wonderful land, and the leader of the free world, this should be attainable.
If you have insurance, it's ok. My daughter just broke her arm, and it has been a fairly painless process for us (well, not her...she is broken!)
What about the uninsured folks?
What's your take on this American issue?Health care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?1st sorry to hear about your daughter.
I live in Australia. And as an Australian you have the right to free medical care. Medicare is available to all Australians, whether you are born here or become a citizen.
No matter how rich or poor you are.
You take your medicare card to the doctor or hospital with you and then the doctor or hospital bills Medicare later for your consultation.
Now, with the way the US economy is compared to the AU economy, then why can't the US Government get it together?Health care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?
I live in the UK and all our health care is freeHealth care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?Exactly how does that work?
Are we going to require the doctors to work for free, or are we going to take tax money from those that have insurance for their families to pay the doctors to treat people without insurance?
I think it's a great idea, but I'm just wondering who we are going to steal from to do this.
46 million Americans have no basic health insurance. Half of that number are Women and Children, no other major country
on Earth treats Women and Children this badly. I would like to see them covered but I prefer allowing them to buy into Medicare for themselves and the kids up to age 18. This would help new moms with pre natal care and Kids with regular Doctor visits and early treatment. As it is now, tax payers pay anyway because all the un insured go without regular visits til the illness gets really bad then they are a charity case. That increases cost for those that can pay for Health care and don't have Insurance.Health care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?lCost ! The price for decent, universal health care is prohibitive. Besides, I am not my brothers keeper. There are way too many dead beats looking for others to resolve their problems, and the fact is, nobody is denied health care, in an emergency.
I suppose it is your thought to offer this amenity to illegal immigrants, as well.
If you really want to know more about it, study the Canadian health care plan. Those in Canada who can afford it, drop down to the lower 48 for their health care. In Canada, the quality of care, and the long, long waits, make it extremely undesirable.Health care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?
That would be a great thing!
Now you have to persuade all the inconsiderate people in America that have no compassion for children in need, to vote for it. Good luck. There's a lot of greedy people who think it should be "survival of the fittest" and "only the strong survive" and stuff like that. Mean huh?
We should be like Canada ALL health care paid for. For ALLHealth care for every child under the age of 18, guaranteed, no questions asked?
maybe its just AZ but here we have AHCCCS (Arizona health care cost containment system) I was raised by a WORKING single mother and was raised on ahcccs health care. docs have said its best insurance available. its availabe to all low income families and individuals. Problem for liberals is that its a state thing and liberals hate states rights and individualism, they want the UNITED STATE of america. give up on the fed gove. and go bother youre individual state to take action.
NO, not if you TRULY belive in fairness. The American way is that everyone gets the same chance at a good life and that by getting what you earned you end up better off than those who didn't do enough to earn a good life. Socialized anything is terribely unfair to anyone who works hard. Besides your not very well informed, we Americans give more money, food, free health care, and other aid to the less fortunate than any other 2 or 3 countries combined.
We sent hundreds of millions and thousands of people for aid to indoneisa after the tsuanami, the Britts sent cots in boxes. Socialists don't really care about the poor, they just say they do to gain power.
lol @ "yummy mummy"- I feel sorry for you sweet heart! You have no idea what GOOD health care is I have heard from many americans who have had Britt health care while visiting, and they are all horrified by how bad it is. China is even worse, worlds tallest woman is dieing because she can't get a surgery she needs to turn off her growth gland.
I think free health care should be a given in any developed country.
I also think it is cruel and inhumain to let people suffer proper health care just because they aren't as well off as others.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)